Why it takes so long to describe all this? Too much redundancy in this
page, sorry.
This game is nothing but original. The so-called Falcon is just
Camel+Zebra from fairy chess. I used a similar Buffalo
(Camel+Zebra+Knight) in my CVs and many inventors did in these pages on
this website.
Also good to know is that a certain Karl Schulz from Austria invented a
Falcon-Hunter Chess in 1943 where the Falcon is moving fw like a Bishop
and bw like a Rook. This variant is reported in many CV books like
Parton's, Boyer's or closer to us, DB Pritchard's.
Basically, I think that patenting a CV is a very bad idea because you just
encourage players to go away. What is the goal of the inventor, what does
he want to protect really ? And if the patent is unavoidable it should be
preceded by a serious anteriority research. This patent has no serious
claim, it's flawed.
Why it takes so long to describe all this? Too much redundancy in this page, sorry.
This game is nothing but original. The so-called Falcon is just Camel+Zebra from fairy chess. I used a similar Buffalo (Camel+Zebra+Knight) in my CVs and many inventors did in these pages on this website.
Also good to know is that a certain Karl Schulz from Austria invented a Falcon-Hunter Chess in 1943 where the Falcon is moving fw like a Bishop and bw like a Rook. This variant is reported in many CV books like Parton's, Boyer's or closer to us, DB Pritchard's. Basically, I think that patenting a CV is a very bad idea because you just encourage players to go away. What is the goal of the inventor, what does he want to protect really ? And if the patent is unavoidable it should be preceded by a serious anteriority research. This patent has no serious claim, it's flawed.