I agree (though I like 0,1,a,b,c,d,e for replacing "6" with something more special), but I can also see wanting something less symmetrical.
However, I'm still concerned about the coordinates inside each face in Bob's approach, and whether it's even well-defined. The four-tuples solves that.
I agree (though I like 0,1,a,b,c,d,e for replacing "6" with something more special), but I can also see wanting something less symmetrical.
However, I'm still concerned about the coordinates inside each face in Bob's approach, and whether it's even well-defined. The four-tuples solves that.