In my opinion you are making a cathedral. It is too complex, just the maths there give me an headache. OK if we were a community with thousands of voters, but we are few tens. Very soon you will have less people participating than fingers in one hand.
First, I want to say that I hope that you understood that my call for "seconding" Metamachy was a kind of joke. I don't care at all about this Featured Games stuff. It is not my sort of things. Neither Metamachy nor none of my variants need this.
Second, me too I think that, indeed, it would be interesting to shine some light on one "Innovative CV". Proposers would have to say why they propose one when doing so. Of course, no self-proposal.
The other criterias should be removed. If a CV is really interesting because it is innovative, THEN, it will be an incentive for someone to code it to be played somewhere, and for someone else to clean and arrange its web page. Currently, we are just doing the opposite.
In my opinion you are making a cathedral. It is too complex, just the maths there give me an headache. OK if we were a community with thousands of voters, but we are few tens. Very soon you will have less people participating than fingers in one hand.
First, I want to say that I hope that you understood that my call for "seconding" Metamachy was a kind of joke. I don't care at all about this Featured Games stuff. It is not my sort of things. Neither Metamachy nor none of my variants need this.
Second, me too I think that, indeed, it would be interesting to shine some light on one "Innovative CV". Proposers would have to say why they propose one when doing so. Of course, no self-proposal.
The other criterias should be removed. If a CV is really interesting because it is innovative, THEN, it will be an incentive for someone to code it to be played somewhere, and for someone else to clean and arrange its web page. Currently, we are just doing the opposite.