The cercle does not suggest a square that can be reached by leaping for me.
I can understand that; I initially used leap arrows for all leaps. But this is why I use the arrow lines for riders; to indicate that these are blockable subsequent rider leaps, not lame rider destinations.
The real trouble is, there seems to be no real standard for these things. There are customs and generally-understood things, but nothing like what Ralph Betza did for the text notation. I'd do it myself if I thought I was up to it (I'm pretty sure it'd involve creating my own chess board painter).
I can understand that; I initially used leap arrows for all leaps. But this is why I use the arrow lines for riders; to indicate that these are blockable subsequent rider leaps, not lame rider destinations.
The real trouble is, there seems to be no real standard for these things. There are customs and generally-understood things, but nothing like what Ralph Betza did for the text notation. I'd do it myself if I thought I was up to it (I'm pretty sure it'd involve creating my own chess board painter).