Check out Modern Chess, our featured variant for January, 2025.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Single Comment

CRC[Subject Thread] [Add Response]
James Zuercher wrote on Tue, Oct 30, 2018 07:33 PM UTC:
Capablanca Random Chess was supposed to be a mix of Capablanca Chess and FisherRandomChess. However neither of these variants required all pawns to be protected. Also FRC did not require that Bishops not be adjacent. If this adjacency rule is not used then logically the rule that Queen and Archbishop not be adjacent would not be applicable. If a CRC game changes the rules from the original inventors rules does the name need to be changed out of respect for the inventor and for consistency? There is a game called Modern Capablanca Random Chess where the black pieces are placed in an inverted order compared to the white pieces.