Now, as we can see, The Capablanca variants have noticeably less draws--but noticeably more wins for white. So, while FIDE Chess may be too drawish, it doesn't have an advantage for White either. So, while not empirically tested, a 8x10/10x10 variant with less power on the board may more closely approach the 50/0/50 (no draws, no advantage for white) ideal. Indeed, we see above that Janus Chess, which has about 1 pawn less power on the board than Capablanca Chess, is a little closer to 50/0/50 than the other Capa variants (The difference is so small, however, that it may be a coincidence).
Is 'crowned chess' closer to this ideal then FIDE chess or Capa chess? I have no idea. The only way to find out is via computer and other testing.
I can also make the argument that my Capa setup, Schoolbook, is closer to 50/0/50 than other Capa variants, since having the powerful pieces in the corner and harder to develop and having the area around the king well defended may lower White's advantage.
Is 'crowned chess' closer to this ideal then FIDE chess or Capa chess? I have no idea. The only way to find out is via computer and other testing.
I can also make the argument that my Capa setup, Schoolbook, is closer to 50/0/50 than other Capa variants, since having the powerful pieces in the corner and harder to develop and having the area around the king well defended may lower White's advantage.
- Sam