Gary Gifford wrote on Wed, Jun 7, 2006 01:03 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
It is good to see a well-thoughtout proposal which actually requires that
the raters play at least one game of what they are to evaluate... of
course I already imagine there will be complainers.
Of the system's steps, I really like number 4, which says a lot, and I
quote:
4. Any ratings submitted would have to be accompanied by a textual
explanation explaining the reasons for the particular ratings. Only after
review by the editorial staff would a rating be accepted. Raters must
have
played at least one game of the variant they are rating.
Very nice David. Well done and well written.