David Paulowich wrote on Thu, Mar 23, 2006 04:46 PM UTC:Poor ★
This page has Ratings and Comments by Title from May 2001 to March 2002. And this page has game logs from the previous PBM system used here. Convince me that the 'March of Progress' on this web site is not going to continue burying valuable information from the past - and I might consider changing this 'Poor' rating.
In my opinion, Terrible = this chess variant is so bad that I am not going to waste my time assigning it a Poor rating (perhaps requiring me to put more thought into my review than the inventor put into his game). So the question is: who will actually be using your new 'Terrible' rating? And how long until someone starts abusing the 'Terrible' rating?
In my opinion, Terrible = this chess variant is so bad that I am not going to waste my time assigning it a Poor rating (perhaps requiring me to put more thought into my review than the inventor put into his game). So the question is: who will actually be using your new 'Terrible' rating? And how long until someone starts abusing the 'Terrible' rating?