Check out Smess, our featured variant for February, 2025.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier ⇧Reverse Order⇩ Later
Rules: Stalemating: Loss[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Kevin Pacey wrote on Sun, Dec 3, 2023 05:12 PM UTC:

Attention: a stalemate in Chak is not a loss for the player delivering stalemate.

To delete Chak from the list here, the member who put it on the list may use the top horizontal menu item that says his/her own name, then click on 'Your Tags', scroll down and then click on the red X (inside a red circle) to the left beside 'Chak'.

[edit: Done, thanks]


HaruN Y wrote on Sun, Dec 3, 2023 11:11 PM UTC in reply to Kevin Pacey from 05:12 PM:

Done. The reason why I tagged it with Stalemating: Loss is because Couch Tomato wrote "stalemateValue=win" instead of "stalemateValue=loss" in https://discord.com/channels/634298688663191582/897605673288863754/909153508756951060. Though it was probably a mistake since that's probably the only message that indirectly says stalemate is a win for the stalemated player. I deleted the tag using the blue X.

Edit: https://discord.com/channels/779317816897699850/791247944463417374/956633220588376144 also says stalemateValue=win.


H. G. Muller wrote on Mon, Dec 4, 2023 06:45 AM UTC in reply to HaruN Y from Sun Dec 3 11:11 PM:

stalemateValue=win should mean that the stalemated player loses, not? I supose that in normal chess you would say checkmateValue=win, not checkmateValue=loss.


HaruN Y wrote on Tue, Jul 23, 2024 05:32 PM UTC in reply to H. G. Muller from Mon Dec 4 2023 06:45 AM:

Mansindam Definition For FSF variants.ini uses "stalemateValue = loss".


4 comments displayed

Earlier ⇧Reverse Order⇩ Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.