Comments by haddadzied
Hi This is not Seirawan Chess. You have to take a look at the rules. Leopard moves like a Knight and Bishop. But Bishop moves are limited to 2 squares which makes it a far less strong pieces than the Hawn in Seirawan Chess. This rules better fits 8x8 boards. The Cannon got a newly published rules. The pieces are commercial
Hi You can use the new pieces developed for musketeer chess. Take a look at www.musketeerchess.com to see the pieces. They are sold exclusively by the House of Staunton my exclusive retailer. Zied
Hi, it's always good to hear criticism. And i think you've got it right.
Personally i give you the pieces i much like when playing Musketeer Chess: Hawk, Unicorn +++ and my favorite is the Archbishop combining Bishop and Knight abilities. I much like sacrificing my Queen for an Archbishop !!
Musketeer Chess idea was to get rid of the big amount of draws and also opening learning (long theoretical lines). The idea is also to give black a more important role by deciding the final combination of pieces, adapting his strategy to white's choice which will lower for sure the importance of white's advantage as the side who begins the game; But this needs for sure a precise play.
You pointed out the fact that the Board is overcrowded. Of course it becomes a problem if you choose to gate you r pieces whithout a prior clear strategy and this will hamper you from exploiting the huge potential of the new pieces.
The newly added pieces are strong and they bring so much excitment and tactics from the first move ! So the slightest lack of attention can be punished (more spectacular wins) but also if you lower your attention even with a huge material advantage on the board, your opponent can surprise you and mate you using the newest pieces whom some can mate alone.
Yes, Musketeer Chess is not a perfect game, but Classic Chess became mostly a game of "knowledge" and opening learning and is for sure less attractive for average kids and players that want to improve their level but are frustrated by this learning.
Elite tournaments are less spectacular and games most usually finish with draws.
Hi all,
I'd like to share with you a project. Creating a classification of Chess Variants using "pragmatic methodology" to compare them.
Please share with me your thoughts here, or at the following link: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-variants/a-system-to-classify-chess-variants
Hi, thank you for your comment.
Raphael mentioned his comment to me. Loving / Preferences are individual choices.
I have a clear conflict of interest here.
Is the fact that the recognised variants section wasn't updated from 2006 means that the administrators of chessvariants haven't found any new / recent variant worth to be added ?
Just to mention that recently, there was many things new concerning Musketeer Chess: Jocly website went down so your website, mine and HG Muller work are the only websites where it's possible to play this variant.
Many engine programmers become to have growing interest in it. The major one is for sure Stockfish that recently released Musketeer Stockfish. There are a total of 6 Programmers that already made engines for Musketeer Chess, which is not an easy variant to program due to the rules that concern the Piece selection and the "Gating Selection" = squares where the pieces will enter the game.
This growing interest is for sure for me a good thing. The majority of these programmers tried to play the game and loved it.
Have you an idea if there are other variants that are currently commercial ?
I runned tens of thousands of engine games and played myself hundreds.
My conclusions based on these tests are as follows: The game seems to be balanced as there are almost equal winning chances comparing black and white chances, and the draw percentage is low (less than 8%). Seirawan Chess that Inspired Musketeer Chess favors clearly White for example.
Thanks again for your comment: PS working on a wiki page and i mentioned your Game Courier in it. A really nice tool.
I hope also that Lichess will add it to their server.
6 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.