Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Robert Fischer wrote on Mon, Nov 29, 2004 03:43 PM EST:
'It is not possible to test EVERY possible permutation since there are
tens of thousands of them.'

I have not made even a wide estimate of the number of select permutations
(with undesirable starting arrays excluded via game-specific criteria)
which would require some study to expediently determine whether or not
they are probably of decent quality.  Perhaps, Dr. Scharnagl has
calculated a firm estimate.  Even if it is not easily possible for one
person to playtest and analyze, for wild example, 10,000 select
permutations in less than 2.7 years (arbitrarily calculated at a rate of
10 per day), this is totally beside the point.

The point is that the quality of EVERY chess variant given to the public
which can legally be played must be protected.  'Bad game pollution' is
already a serious problem in the chess variant world.  If you wish to, in
effect, give the public 10,000 unique games to play, then it is your
responsibility to adequately playtest and analyze every damned one of
them.  Otherwise, please do NOT do it!  To be sure, noone has the right to
carelessly or lazily give the public a package of, in effect, 10,000 unique
games ... knowing that the vast majority of them are defective.  Hence, a
program designed to play 'Capablanca Random Chess' must NOT be capable
of loading ANY flawed starting arrays for people to waste time and
frustrate themselves playing.

I realize this entails a vast amount of work but if someone wishes to be
rightfully known as the inventor of, in effect, a couple-few thousand
unique, 'high-quality' (rather than 'low-quality') games, then this is
what they must do to earn it.

'And I think it is totally unnecessary.  Fischer Random Chess has 960
different set-ups, and probably, by now, all have been played at least
once, but *NO* organized effort has been made to test each and every one
by high-level Chess players for playability.  In fact, FRC doesn't even
try to avoid unprotected pawns.  Considering the number of FRC
enthusiasts, I doubt it's necessary.'

Popularity is no guarantee or proof of quality.  Do you also doubt that
quality is necessary?

Notwithstanding, what 'Bobby Fischer' and others have been disgracefully
derelict in doing should not be imitated.

'As long as white and black have identical setups (mirror-symmetry, not
rotational-symmertry) the game appears to be fair.  I see no reason why
Capablanca Random Chess would not be fair, especially since Dr. Scharnagl
has excluded all setups with unprotected pawns.'

Unavoidably, fairness must be proven individually for every unique game
studied as a permutation of the set.

I am very pleased to find that Dr. Scharnagl has already established rules
for determining a select list of permutations.  Perhaps, he is already far
more aware than I of what he needs to do in the future to achieve success
for his project.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Recognized Chess Variants

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.