Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Sat, Aug 11, 2012 09:18 AM UTC:
> Is there anyone who would seriously argue that white
> retains any first move advantage? If so, how? Enjoy!

I see no reason why white would not have any serious first-move advantage
here. The game will be horribly drawish, of course, so any advantage is
likely to be small. In Shatranj the draw rate is about 70%, and has even
more pieces weakened, so you really need a lead of 3 or 4 pieces before it
becomes a winning advantage. Although the change w.r.t. FIDE that causes
most of the drawishness is probably that Pawns promote to a worthless
piece, and this is not made worse here.

But the basic mechanism remains valid. The initial position is not an
impenetrable fortress, nor can such a fortress be reached before the enemy
can engage you. If you just sit and wait, allowing the opponent to set up
his plan, he will be able to achieve a decisive break trough. That the
pieces move slowly hinders defense just as much as attack. If anything, it
makes the advantage of a tempo larger. If the opponent spreads out his
pieces, while you pile up your material just in front of his King, he will
be too late to involve the pieces on the wings in his defense, and will get
checkmated. If he contracts all his pieces around his King, you will direct
your attack to one of the wings, to create a breakthrough there and promote
a few Pawns. Pieces are still sufficiently stronger than Pawns that you
cannot afford to ignore promotion. So with nearly full material on the
board there is no static fortress that is impervious to attack.

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.