Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To 🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Mon, Nov 23, 2009 02:43 PM UTC:Rich, Let me take your idea of distilling what I like about variants into one variant and see how far it will go. What I like about variants is playing a variety of different games that each has its own character, due to having its own rules, pieces, and/or board. How can this be distilled into one game? It can't be. It is impossible. We may combine elements of different games together, but the resulting game will have its own character, and it will not preserve the character of the other games. For example, Eurasian Chess combines elements of Chess and Xiangqi, but it does not have the same character as either of these games. To give a more extreme example, Knightmare Chess borrows elements from a wide variety of variants, and it is a very enjoyable game, but it also has a very different character than other variants. The idea of distilling what I like about variants into one game is dead in the water. It is no more viable than distilling what I like about different foods into one food or what I like about different TV shows into one TV show. Just to pick two of the TV shows I watch, is there any viable way to distill what I like about Family Guy and Smallville into a single TV show? There isn't. The character of each show is so different from the character of the other that any mixture of them would lose something. My point here is that any attempt to distill what we like about variants into a single game is going to inevitably lose something of what we like about variants. What I like about variants is too much for one game to contain, and instead of trying to fit it all into one game, I just appreciate having a variety of different games. Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID NextChess4 does not match any item.